Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the weight (215g / 7,58oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
