Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
