Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
