Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX
