Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
