Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
