Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
