Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
