Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
