Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX
