Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
