Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
