Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
