Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.89 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 200g / 7,06oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,06oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
