Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX stands out for a weight of 150g / 5,29oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
