Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €490.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (200g / 7,05oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
