Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 200g / 7,06oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT?
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,06oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
