Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.7:1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
