Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a weight of 285g / 10,05oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin REDIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
