Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X
