Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a weight of 270g / 9,52oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
