Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7584oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29528 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €64.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7584oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7584oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
