Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31496 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
