Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
