Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C
Spinning
5000d-cx
74.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €81.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C?
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
