Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
