Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX stands out for a weight of 250g / 8,82oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
