Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a weight of 300g / 10,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin REDIX
