Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X stands out for a weight of 260g / 9,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
