Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
