Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
