Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
70.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a durability of 5.89 out of 10, while Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
