Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a weight of 280g / 9,88oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
