Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
