Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin HORNET 50X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin HORNET?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
