Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin HORNET 60X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin HORNET?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
