Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin INKS 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
