Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
