Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Delphin REDIX?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Delphin REDIX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
