Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.89 out of 10). Still, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 258g / 9,1oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
