Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
