Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Battle III 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Penn Battle III 6000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Penn Battle III 6000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.6:1 and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
