Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
