Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 270g / 9,52oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
