Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 280g / 9,88oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
