Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.5:1 and a weight of 284g / 10,02oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
