Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 255g / 8,99oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
