Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and durability (5.89 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
