Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a weight of 210g / 7,41oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
