Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
